Tenuously related article photograph.
One day we are being hectored and nannied into eating less meat because someone somewhere decided they are entitled to tell us what we may or may not eat :
Government advisers to recommended lower meat consumption
Britons will be told this week to limit their red meat consumption to the equivalent of a large pack of mince a week for the sake of their health.
A Government-commissioned report to be published by scientists will say that eating less red meat and processed meat lowers the risk of developing cancer.
It is expected to recommended that consumers eat no more than 2.5 oz (70g) of red or processed meat a day – the equivalent of three rashers of bacon.
The weekly recommended limit is likely to be 1.1 lb (500g), the same as eating a large pack of minced beef, two 8oz steaks or four 4oz pork chops.
However ministers are likely to face accusations that they are furthering the “nanny state” by telling citizens what to eat, while the farming and retail industries will object strongly to anything that threatens their livelihoods.
As an aside, notice the bit in red which must make it more official and scary or maybe evidence of an idle journo who forgot to get all the facts down at the press briefing.
And the next day we are being told that it may not be a good idea to reduce your meat intake after all :
Women at risk of iron deficiency if meat consumption falls
Women could be put at greater risk of iron deficiency if they follow new advice to eat less red meat, it has been warned.
A Government-commissioned report will recommend this week that Britons limit their consumption to 1.1lb (500g) of red or processed meat a week in order to reduce their risk of developing bowel cancer.
This is equivalent to eating a large pack of minced beef or two 8oz steaks a week, or three rashers of bacon daily.
However there is concern that some groups, particularly women, may develop iron deficiencies if they reduce their meat consumption too drastically.
Without sufficient iron to produce red blood cells, women are prone to develop anaemia which can cause tiredness, fainting and heart palpitations.
The draft report by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN), published in 2009, acknowledges that “girls and women of reproductive age” are already “at risk of iron deficiency”.
There is also a health professional making a decent point for a change (emphasis mine) :
Dr Carrie Ruxton, a dietician who is also a member of the Meat Advisory Panel, said: “We’ve already got 50 per cent of women in this country who have iron intakes below the absolute minimum in your diet.
“Are we going to have more women who are going to be iron deficient because of this sort of advice?
“Women are already below the 70g and it’s usually women that take on board new public health advice and start cutting things out.”
I only wish that the government and associated shroud wavers and interest groups to just fuck off and leave us to our own devices.
On a related diet and hectoring note, Devils Knife has a wonderful skewering of a whole raft of health advice here.
Hi there! I completely agree with your thoughts. I really respect what you’re doing here.
Hey mate! Great website ! I really enjoyed being here.
Amazing site! How can I share it on Facebook?
So going by that chart oxtail is still okay, right? And there’s a lot of meat on a kangaroo tail. Lean, tasty, tasty meat. And wings. Chicken, turkeys, duck, goose and buffalo (fuck knows how) must all be alright too. Pig’s trotters don’t appeal to me much but I notice they’re not mentioned. And then of course there’s everything with fins and tentacles, much of which is lovely. Thanks, PETA, I think I’ll go shoot something in the face right now.
I must admit that after having smiled at fins I then misread tentacles for testicles and nearly choked on half a digestive. 🙂
Keyboards revenge perhaps?
No need for “hands on” research – just watch how they move next time the bull is having his wicked way!
And DON’T ask me how I know….
I won’t ask but I am not sure who is the most twisted now 🙂
Good point microdave although I think some hands on research will be needed now.
The will be my excuse at least when I am caught “manipulating” down on the farm – “they looked fake officer”.
All animals DO NOT have the same parts – when did you last see a cow with fake tits?