Government waste in action.

by | May 16, 2010 | Economic Intrigue, Just plain weird

An article at The Adam Smith Institute blog has an excellent example of one of the kind of things that the new coalition government can take their spending axe to :

As it currently stands, anyone entering full-time higher education can receive financial support from the government in the form of Tuition Fee funding and Maintenance Loans, as well as the option of a means-tested grant. Additionally, if you have any form of disability or learning disorder, you are eligible for Disabled Student’s Allowance, which is available regardless of family income, and doesn’t have to be paid back.

Quite why the Disabled Students Allowance is given regardless of income is beyond me but it gets worse :

Being dyslexic, my friend was delighted to discover that he was eligible for up to £5,161 worth of ‘specialist equipment’, and so applied for DSA. His experience is a prime example of inefficient and wasteful government.

After a needs assessment in September and the promise of a shiny new laptop, processing the case took over eight months. Nevertheless, the ‘essential’ technological support eventually arrived- in the form of a MacBook Pro, a printer and voice-recognition software. However, the delivery also included (amongst much more) a scanner, USB hub, a backpack, an ink allowance, and, strangely enough, an AA battery charger. Call me insensitive, but I simply cannot understand the necessity of all these items for a dyslexic university student.

My expressions of disapproval led to accusations of bitterness and jealousy. In fact, I was shocked that such items should be provided by the government, regardless of income- and without even being asking for. The response I received from my friend was, “But I’ve done nothing wrong- they’re free”. However, the gadgets weren’t free. They had been paid for by other people’s money –confiscated through taxation. They were funded with money that would have been put to better use were it allowed to stay in the individuals’ pockets, rather than paying for backpacks for dyslexics

Not only is more than £5k worth of equipment (some of which is rather surprising to say the least) dished out willy-nilly, I can’t begin to imagine how much extra is spent by the small army of administrators running that scheme. You can also be sure that this type of thing is replicated in many hundreds of similar schemes.

At least there is plenty of meat to get the axe into.

0 Comments